I think that the punishment for a commited crime in this country is much overlooked, and frequently misunderstood. A lot of things take place out-of-sight to those who haven’t had any experience (be that first or second-hand) to behind the locked-cell doors. I’ll give an example to what I mean:
—
Last month, warders at the maximum security Wakefield Prison found that some inmates, including sex offenders, were using their PS2s to watch pornographic DVDs.
Wakefield MP Mary Creagh demanded that authorities at the prison, which houses Roy Whiting and Ian Huntley, implement tougher controls to clamp down on the viewing of pornography.
Following the discovery, prisoners were banned from having the consoles in their cells - and nine of those who had their PS2s taken away received a total of £1800 in compensation. The Prison Service argued that this was simply a case of refunding the men, who purchased the PS2s with their own money.
It’s thought that a failure to offer compensation could have been seen as a breach of human rights - and that the threat of legal action may have influenced the decision.
The move has been strongly condemned by local politicians and victims’ groups. Norman Brennan, chairman of the Victim of Crime Trust, told the Yorkshire Post that it made “a mockery of the whole criminal justice system.”
Creagh said she also disagreed with the decision, on the grounds that prisoners “have forfeited the right to free enjoyment and possession of PlayStations by using them in this way.”
A spokesperson for the Prison Service said: “The prisoners were not given compensation, but were refunded for their Playstations.”
—
Now, how many of you thought you could get PS2s whilst you were in prison, and also where in the understanding that it is part of human rights to be able to access pornography whilst you’re detained. Now, okay, there are obviously more serious matters at hand when people are in prison, but I bet the majority of you were under the impression that people were simply locked up… and didn’t know that they could purchase a PS2 and watch porn. Which is their right.
The meaning of this post was the fact that I read this on a forum I’m a member of:
—
There was an article in the paper this morning about a thief who stole a motorbike, and even though he got caught the victim was advised not to press charges as the thief might sue him because there wasn’t a helmet for him to steal so he could have been injured!
—
Basically the law now states that the person who had his bike stolen is not allowed to press charges, simply because he didn’t leave his helmet for the criminal to steal, therefore the criminal could have been injured.
Honestly, that is pathetic.
